Rick Cofer started his journey by getting his BA degree from the University of Texas in Austin. He began his studies with Government and History from the years 2000 to 2004 then went on to get his Doctor of Law degree from 2005 thru 2007.
‘Innocent until proven guilty’ is a well-known phrase to most Americans but for juveniles criminal suspects, the phrase has a different meaning. Rick Cofer is one of the professionals that have invested his resources and time to understand the subject matter by exploring the reasons why most juvenile suspects confess crimes even without a legal procedure. The first stop in Cofer’s knowledge search is the psychological makeup of a teenager. Rick Cofer points out the interactions between the teenager and the police officer are supposed to be safe, and most importantly, free of presumptions. According to him, however, most interactions between police officers and juveniles do not follow the above guidelines.
Still on the psychological aspect of a teenager in the hands of a police officer, Rick Cofer points out that communication is always a problem. The first person, a teenager, is most likely to contact in this case scenario is their parents or guardians. However, Cofer points out that the communications are incomplete and in most cases unclear. He points out that the leading cause of these incomplete communications between the juvenile suspects and parents are the police officers. According to him, this to a certain extent compromises the legality of the whole procedure. According to him, this should never be the case especially in a country like the USA.
In addition to the psychological aspect of juveniles in a crime suspect case, Rick explores other important aspects of the interrogation process. For example, most states acknowledge Miranda rights, which dictates that the police officer should wait for the parent before starting to interrogation process. Cofer believes that this should be the recommended approach, but unfortunately, most police officers question the juveniles even before even the parents’ arrival. Although there is a legal grey area on this subject matter in some states, he believes that waiting for a parent is ethical and the best way to approach legal interrogations. Get Additional Information Here.
Finally, Rick Cofer challenges the general notion and the purpose of interrogation. As a criminal lawyer, most interrogating offers approaches the process from the perspective of forcing the suspect to confess. According to him, this should never be the case. Rick Cofer is a firm believer that interrogation should be a fact-finding mission as opposed to ‘confessing exercise.’